C-ATS absorption data: BSRIA BS EN ISO 354 results

TL;DR: C-ATS panels were independently tested by BSRIA to BS EN ISO 354 (the reverberation-room method), Report 100241/1. The Reverberation panel is a broadband absorber reaching toward full absorption across the mids and highs; the Resonance panel is corner-loaded for low frequencies; the Reflection panel is a low-absorption, clean reflector when bonded. The measured octave-band figures are below.

How to read these tables

Values are sound absorption coefficientss) per octave band unless noted: 0 = reflective, 1.0 = fully absorptive. (Reverberation-room figures can exceed 1.0 — an edge-diffraction characteristic of the method, not an error.) Resonance is reported as equivalent absorption area per panel (m²), because it is used discretely in corners. New to this? See how to read an absorption table.

Reverberation Control Panel (REV-CP-50)

A broadband absorber — the room's main reverberation tool. Plane-absorber coefficients (αs):

Hz 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
αs 0.25 0.51 0.88 1.09 1.07 1.18

Reflection Control Panel (REF-CP)

Tuned as a clean reflector, with absorption depending on how it's fixed (see mounting):

Hz 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
αs — bonded (default) 0.01 0.08 0.28 0.11 0.01 0.06
αs — screw-only 0.01 0.20 0.54 0.12 0.04 0.09

Resonance Control Panel (RES-CP)

Corner-loaded low-frequency control — strongest where it matters, in the bass. Equivalent absorption area per panel (m²), corner placement:

Hz 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
Aobj (m²/panel) 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.25 0.15 0.14

Test details

  • Standard: BS EN ISO 354:2003 (reverberation-room method), BSRIA, Report 100241/1.
  • Mounting matters: how a panel is fixed changes its absorption — see the bonded vs screw-only figures above.
  • Not covered by this report: the Marine Reflection Control Panel and the Isolation System (isolation is a sound-insulation, not absorption, measurement).

FAQ

Are C-ATS panels independently tested?
Yes — by BSRIA to BS EN ISO 354 (Report 100241/1).

Why does the Reverberation panel read above 1.0?
That's a normal characteristic of the reverberation-room test method (edge diffraction), not an error.

Why is the Resonance panel shown in m² rather than a coefficient?
Because it's used discretely in corners, so equivalent absorption area per panel is the meaningful figure.

Is there data for the Marine panel?
Not in this report — marine and isolation products are assessed separately.